Before she booked her first ride with an illegal carpool driver on Telegram, 18-year-old Ms Faa received warnings from her friends: You’ll meet all sorts of people. Never sit in the front. Never pay in advance.
It did not sound 100 per cent safe, but like many young students looking for ways to save money, she decided to take the plunge and started using the illegal service earlier this month for her commute from the east to the city, where her school is.
But already she has had an unpleasant encounter. During one ride, the driver pressed her to have a meal with him before dropping her off.
“He kept asking if I liked biryani or prata and insisted we should eat together,” said the university student, who declined to reveal her full name since the carpooling service is illegal in Singapore.
“Before that, he was talking to me nicely – and I’m a talkative person, so I chatted with him like I normally would with private-hire drivers.”
Feeling uneasy, Ms Faa resorted to a threat: “I told him I have a lot of family members who are lawyers, so if he did anything funny, I’d sue him.”
Although she made it home safely, the interaction deeply unsettled Ms Faa. But she soon realised through conversations with her friends that such horror stories are common among passengers who frequently use these carpooling services.
Indeed, several passengers who frequently use these services, typically accessed via the Telegram messaging app, shared similarly distressing stories. Most of them spoke to CNA TODAY on the condition of anonymity.
Some said they had received inappropriate messages from strangers or potential drivers, while others have had to deal with such propositions in person.
Mr Jun, a sales executive in his 20s, recalled one such encounter that took place at the end of a car ride with a female driver four years ago. Upon arriving at his destination, she told him that his ride would be free of charge if he were to perform a sexual favour for her.
“I just threw some cash at her and immediately ran out of the car,” Mr Jun said.
Ms Megan, a 32-year-old office administrator, started receiving disturbing text messages from strangers after posting a request for a ride in a chat group dedicated to carpooling services. One even offered to pay her for an erotic act.
During one ride, as she was sitting in the front passenger seat, the driver suddenly asked Ms Megan if she had “needs to be fulfilled”, which she quickly inferred was a reference to sex.
“I straight up told him: ‘It seems like you’re married’, based on the toys he had on the dashboard. He quickly switched the topic.”
Despite how commonly such horror stories are shared among passengers, illegal carpooling services continue to be popular and have been difficult for the authorities to stamp out, not least because they are cheap.
Fares are negotiated between passenger and driver, and frequent carpoolers told CNA TODAY that these fares are often up to 60 per cent cheaper than those on legal platforms, with some rides even offered for free.
Frequent carpoolers told CNA TODAY that these fares are often up to 60 per cent cheaper than those on legal platforms. (Photo: CNA/Raj Nadarajan) Furthermore, these illegal carpooling services also cater to cross-border travel.
Checks by CNA TODAY found numerous requests for door-to-door rides between various locations in Singapore and Johor Bahru made in Telegram and Facebook groups.
To be sure, those who have used illegal carpooling services to cross the Causeway have their fair share of horror stories, too.
Content creator Azula Cinta Idris, 24, found herself detained at Woodlands Checkpoint with her husband on Feb 25 after their driver, booked for her by her aunt through Telegram, was caught attempting to smuggle duty-unpaid cigarettes into Singapore.
According to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority, a total of 165 cartons and 251 packets of duty-unpaid cigarettes were hidden in the roof panel of the Malaysia-registered car.
“I was stunned when I saw the amount of contraband (cigarettes). I really thought I was going to get arrested,” she told CNA TODAY.
Since Ms Azula typically uses taxis approved by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) for cross-border travel, she assumed the car her aunt had booked was a legitimate service, not knowing that it could be anything else.
“After explaining my situation to the officers, they did their thorough checks and decided that my husband and I were just suay (unlucky), so they let us go. They also warned us against booking illegal transport to travel.”
Carpooling with strangers for a fee, through informal channels such as Telegram chat groups, is illegal due to its informal nature and lack of regulation.
It is also illegal for Malaysia-registered private cars or private-hire cars here to provide cross-border or ride-hail services within Singapore.
These services operate outside the framework of LTA’s rules and have led to concerns about safety, as drivers may not adhere to proper vehicle standards, have the necessary insurance or even a licence.
Last month, a state coroner warned against using carpooling services like those on Telegram, advising commuters to use private-hire vehicles, taxis, or public transport instead.
His warning came after the death of a 21-year-old passenger in a van accident on Dec 31, 2023, whose 18-year-old driver, who did not have a valid licence, had been offering rides through a Telegram group.
Other cases have also made headlines. A 23-year-old man was arrested for molesting a 14-year-old passenger who had requested a ride from Yishun to Woodlands through a Telegram chat group in 2023.
He was sentenced to 14 months’ jail and three strokes of the cane. He was also fined S$1,800 for other offences, including using his Malaysia-registered car as a public service vehicle without a valid licence.
In 2019, a man who had been suspended from driving for Grab targeted female victims seeking rides through Telegram carpooling services, driving young women to secluded places, such as a multistorey car park and a forested area, and molesting them.
He was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison and six strokes of the cane.
The issue of illegal carpooling services was raised earlier this month in Parliament by Ms Yeo Wan Ling, a Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC Member of Parliament, who had asked about the measures being taken to stop such arrangements via online chat groups.
Senior Minister of State for Transport Dr Amy Khor said in response that LTA conducts enforcement action against drivers who are found to have provided illegal carpooling services.
She laid out the repercussions: An individual offering an illegal carpooling service may face a fine of up to S$3,000, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. Those providing an illegal carpool matching service could face a fine of up to S$10,000, up to six months’ imprisonment, or both.
Additionally, anyone found providing illegal carpooling services without a valid vocational license – or employing or allowing someone to do so – may face a fine of up to S$1,000, up to three months in jail, or both if convicted.
Passengers of such services, however, do not face any penalties, LTA said.
“Carpooling is only permitted through licensed platforms like GrabHitch and RydePool, permitted licence-exempt business platforms, or among friends and colleagues.
“Any arrangements through informal non-business mediums or chat groups are not allowed. For safety reasons, motorcycle-pooling is completely prohibited regardless of the booking platform,” said LTA.
Experts CNA TODAY spoke to acknowledged the severity of the punishment for drivers, but said that enforcement is a tricky issue, as multiple underlying factors contribute to the continued prevalence of these illegal services.
CNA TODAY found numerous requests for door-to-door rides between various locations in Singapore and Johor Bahru. (Photo: CNA/Lim Li Ting) WHY PASSENGERS ARE WILLING TO TAKE THE RISK Despite the risks, passengers interviewed by CNA TODAY, mostly individuals below 30, said the lower fares offered by unregulated carpooling services on Telegram – known as Telehitch for short – were the primary reason they turned to the platform.
Communications associate Alison Lim, 24, was an active user between 2019 and 2023 – during her student years – booking these rides about two to three times a week.
She has since stopped using these services because she has started working and can now afford to book rides on legitimate ride-hailing apps.
“As a student, cost was my main concern. Grab could get really expensive, but with Telehitch, you could bargain for lower prices,” she said.
Most of Ms Lim’s rides were to and from Nanyang Technological University (NTU), and she would often book Telehitch, particularly when she had heavy bags. However, the pricing varied significantly depending on the driver, she said.
“For example, NTU to Ang Mo Kio was typically around S$30 with Grab, but I usually paid only S$10 to S$12 through carpooling.”
Ms Lim said she would receive free ride offers, too. “But some drivers clearly seemed ‘off’, like insisting I sit in the front seat or giving off weird vibes. So I wouldn’t take those.
“But other times, I thought it was okay, so I did accept about five or six free rides, which, in hindsight, was dangerous. Thankfully, nothing happened to me.”
Similarly, university student Mr Koh, 23, found his rides to school to be at least 30 to 40 per cent cheaper on Telehitch compared with legitimate platforms such as Grab or Tada.
While he has never personally encountered any problems, he has heard stories from his female friends of drivers asking for sexual favours in lieu of a cash payment.
“As a guy, I’m not too concerned about it. As long as the driver seems genuine and provides their live location and plate number when I ask, I feel it’s fine,” Mr Koh said.
Ms Faa, the student whose driver pressured her to have a meal with him, said the lack of legitimate taxi and private hire drivers at odd hours also prompted her to turn to Telehitch.
“I tried using (legal platforms) for my 8am classes, but sometimes there aren’t any available drivers. But when I post in the Telegram group chat looking for a ride, multiple drivers often respond at once, and I just pick the one I’d prefer to reply to,” Ms Faa said.
Other passengers also told CNA TODAY that Telehitch was their go-to option for securing affordable late-night rides home after clubbing or social gatherings.
Lower fares offered by unregulated carpooling services on Telegram – known as Telehitch for short – were the primary reason commuters turned to the platform. (Photo: CNA/Raj Nadarajan) HISTORY OF ILLEGAL TAXIS Unregulated carpooling services have proliferated across various Telegram chat groups, with SG Hitch being the largest so far. As of Mar 18, it had over 145,000 members.
While these groups present themselves as community-driven ride-sharing solutions, experts argue they are merely the latest iteration of a perennial problem: Illegal taxis.
Illegal or unlicensed taxi services are far from being a modern phenomenon. In the 1950s and 1960s, so-called pirate taxis were rampant in Singapore, driven largely by unemployment and the inability of bus services to keep up with the growing demand for public transport.
According to a 1964 article in The Straits Times, then police secretary Mr T Chelliah warned that those travelling in pirate taxis were not covered by insurance, unlike passengers in licensed taxis.
“The majority of pirate taxis, besides being far from roadworthy, are driven by young and inexperienced drivers,” he was quoted as saying.
The Singapore government took steps to regulate the taxi industry by forming large cooperatives to replace unlicensed operators. One of the key initiatives was the establishment of NTUC Comfort (now ComfortDelGro) in November 1970.
NTUC Comfort, or the NTUC Co-operative Commonwealth for Transport Limited, aimed to provide stable employment for taxi drivers while reducing the influence of unregulated pirate taxis.
Transport expert Associate Professor Walter Theseira from the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) added that illegal taxis were tolerated initially in the 1960s.
He said this was a sign of regulatory failure, which occurs when it becomes difficult or economically unviable for most drivers to become officially licensed, and when the licensing conditions are not recognised by commuters or drivers as serving a useful purpose.
“It then becomes a political decision whether to update regulations, crack down on illegal operators, or do both. In the 1970s, Singapore chose to do both,” he said.
Since then, Singapore’s transportation market has evolved significantly with the emergence of ride-hailing platforms, balancing regulation with consumer demand by setting a minimum standard of quality.
But while the era of traditional pirate taxis is long over, their modern counterparts today persist in the form of unregulated carpooling services, facilitated through informal platforms such as Telegram, Facebook, and WhatsApp.
Collapse Expand
A WAY TO RECOVER FUEL COSTS, MEET PEOPLE Telehitch drivers, on the other hand, are willing to take the risk of running afoul of the law to offset their fuel costs.
Many also see it as an opportunity to earn extra cash while on the road, without being subjected to restrictions. LTA regulations limit registered carpool drivers to a maximum of two trips per day.
Mr Jun, the passenger who met the female driver asking for a sexual favour, is now a Telehitch driver himself.
As his sales job requires him to be on the road quite a lot, he often checks the chat groups to see if he can pick up passengers along the way to cover petrol costs.
“On Telegram, there are no fixed prices. I prefer letting the rider offer their own price. For example, a Pasir Ris to Orchard trip typically ranges between S$15 and S$18, and if they offer something within that range, I’ll accept.”
As a driver, Mr Jun said that he has had his fair share of bizarre encounters with passengers as well, such as women trying to barter for free rides after arriving at their drop-off locations.
“There were three or four instances where they asked, ‘Can I not pay you, but do something else for you instead?’ My response is always the same: ‘I don’t want you. I want your money’.”
Another driver, who wanted to be known only as Rhys, initially started offering Telehitch rides to cover his petrol costs too. But he soon realised he enjoyed meeting new people and started seeing it as a valuable networking opportunity.
A former insurance agent in his 20s, Mr Rhys said Telehitch was a good opportunity to meet new people. He has since transitioned to a corporate role.
“Back when I was self-employed, I did Telehitch almost every night. A friend would often join me, and we just liked driving around for hours and meeting people,” he said.
While Mr Rhys is lucky to have avoided any unpleasant encounters with passengers, he has some unusual memories, too. For example, some passengers would make “rounding” requests, which means they want him to drive around aimlessly without a specific drop-off point.
Often, these passengers are simply looking for company or want to blow off some steam.
“I remember my first customer. The moment he got in, he looked at me and said, ‘I just broke up. Can we just go for a drive?’ Then we talked and suddenly became friends.”
And despite the authorities’ efforts to take enforcement action against drivers who offer carpooling services illegally, both Mr Jun and Mr Rhys said it is quite easy to avoid getting caught.
“If I have only one passenger, I always ask them to sit in the front seat,” said Mr Jun.
“After encountering a roadblock near Bugis early last year, I became more careful. A traffic police asked me if I was part of Telehitch, and I just said the passenger was my friend.”
Mr Rhys, who ran into roadblocks thrice while carpooling, usually during the wee hours, said that it was easy to avoid suspicion as most of the passengers he picked up were around his age.
“I would just chat normally with the passengers and get some basic details. If officers ask questions, it comes off as a ‘friend giving a friend a ride’ situation.”
Telehitch drivers are willing to take the risk of running afoul of the law to offset their fuel costs. (Photo: CNA/Raj Nadarajan) WHY THE ILLEGAL SERVICE STILL THRIVES Singapore’s public transport system is often hailed as world-class, but the consistent demand for illegal carpooling suggests that there may be gaps in the transport system that need to be addressed, said experts.
While passengers like it because it is much cheaper than legal options, drivers go for it because they do not have to pass through regulatory checks, undergo special training or pay third-party fees.
For example, Associate Professor Walter Theseira from the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) said that compared with private-hire driving, which involves more stringent regulations, illegal carpooling drivers can offer lower prices because they do not have to pay commissions or platform fees.
Private-hire drivers must also obtain a vocational driving licence, ensure their vehicle meets safety and insurance standards and comply with platform regulations, he added.
“These additional requirements increase their operating costs, making their services more expensive. In contrast, illegal carpooling operators can bypass these costs, allowing them to offer cheaper fares.”
Assoc Prof Theseira said that this is particularly relevant for Malaysian drivers offering the service to Singaporeans who want to cross the border, as they benefit from lower operating costs, such as the use of Malaysia-registered vehicles and cheaper petrol.
Singapore- and Malaysia-registered taxis are the only licensed providers of cross-border services. LTA requires Malaysia-registered taxis to obtain a Public Service Vehicle Licence and an ASEAN Public Service Vehicle Permit to provide cross-border point-to-point (P2P) services.
Assistant Professor Terence Fan from the Singapore Management University noted that geographical factors are another key driver of this trend.
While Singapore’s public transport system is generally efficient and covers many areas, there are still pockets that remain underserved despite the availability of buses, he noted.
“These buses may not reach the specific destinations people need or might require lengthy transfers. For those near their workplaces, carpooling could be seen as a way to reduce their travel time.”
Dr Fan also pointed to the lack of affordable transport options during off-hours, such as after midnight when public transport stops operating and ride-hailing platforms sometimes start implementing surge pricing. This is where the demand for informal carpooling comes in.
Still, the experts note that passengers who choose to Telehitch should be fully aware of the risks.
Associate Professor Raymond Ong from the National University of Singapore (NUS) said insurance coverage is not provided for these illegal rides, and some of these drivers might even be operating without a valid licence, leaving passengers without protection.
“There’s no way for insurance to cover claims in the event of an accident. While passengers may think they’re saving money today, if something goes wrong, there’s little recourse.”
He pointed to GrabHitch as an example of a regulated service that offers insurance and protection. In contrast, informal carpooling provides no such safeguards, and if a dispute arises between a passenger and driver, there is no clear way to resolve it “unless it becomes a criminal case”.
Ms Yeo, the Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC MP, told CNA TODAY that unlike regulated platforms that verify the identities of both drivers and passengers, chat groups lack the ability to do so, which adds to the risk.
“Chat groups lack the ability to verify user identities since they do not collect member information. In contrast, sanctioned platforms maintain recorded identity records for both drivers and commuters, ensuring greater accountability and safety,” said Ms Yeo, who is also adviser to the National Private Hire Vehicles Association and the National Taxi Association.
The experts acknowledged that enforcement of informal carpooling is challenging because, in practice, it’s difficult to monitor every point-to-point transport arrangement and check every vehicle.
For example, as the experience of the drivers Mr Jun and Mr Rhys has shown, if authorities conduct a roadblock and question drivers, they can easily claim to be giving a ride to a friend, making it hard to prove otherwise.
“This is why such markets continue to operate. They thrive in regulatory grey areas where full enforcement is nearly impossible. Looking back at Singapore’s past, illegal taxis were widespread for similar reasons,” said Assoc Prof Theseira of SUSS.
He stressed that, ultimately, regulations must strike a balance between safety and practicality.
A stricter system, such as requiring daily vehicle inspections, would improve safety but also impose unreasonable costs, added Assoc Prof Theseira.
“Singapore has set its regulatory standards at a specific level, and while stricter regulations could reduce illegal activity, they could also make legal transport services more costly or less accessible. This trade-off is a key challenge in enforcement.”
Experts note that passengers who choose to Telehitch should be fully aware of the risks. (Photo: CNA/Raj Nadarajan) IS RAISING PUBLIC AWARENESS ENOUGH? Ms Yeo, the MP, stressed that more Singaporeans should be aware of the potential risks involved so they can make informed decisions.
“It’s also necessary to go after the platform owners and administrators of such chat groups as well. They are facilitating something that is not legal.”
She added that the government should consider tougher legislation, such as banning strangers hitching rides from each other.
Responding to CNA TODAY’s queries, LTA said between 2020 and 2024, 23 drivers were caught providing illegal carpooling or motorcycle-pooling services.
Drivers charged in court and convicted were fined up to S$3,000, and were disqualified from holding or obtaining all classes of driving licences for 12 months, it added.
On cross-border travel, LTA noted that since 2022, 49 drivers have been caught providing illegal cross-border passenger transport services using foreign-registered vehicles.
“All of their vehicles were impounded. The penalties for those convicted include hefty fines and vehicle forfeiture.”
On efforts to raise public awareness, LTA said it began displaying public awareness messages at bus stops last year and will continue this effort to educate commuters about the risks of illegal cross-border and carpooling services.
Other ongoing enforcement measures include working with online platforms, such as Carousell, Klook, KKday and Google, to remove advertisements for illegal cross-border services, it added.
“Our approach to enhancing cross-border connectivity has been to improve the availability of mass public transport options, including the existing cross-border bus services and the upcoming Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System Link.
“Passengers in Singapore who prefer taking a taxi to Malaysia may book cross-border trips through licensed Singapore taxi operators via their respective hotline or enquiry form, and our Singapore taxis can pick them up or drop them off at their homes,” said LTA.
NUS’ Assoc Prof Ong suggested that aside from enforcement, one solution could be to expand the pool of drivers in the P2P transport industry because, ultimately, the issue comes down to supply and demand.
“If there is unmet demand, we need to increase supply. However, the challenge lies in recruiting enough drivers, which remains a difficult task.”
Assoc Prof Theseira agreed, noting that history shows cost-driven carpooling and ride-hiring are challenging to eliminate.
“Typically, the issue is addressed by expanding the legal market, making services more accessible and easier to provide. But Singapore already has a very open system with low barriers to entry, focused primarily on safety.
“That’s why the solution in the past was to make it easier to provide legal taxi services (rather than simply) cracking down on illegal ones.”
If an increase in supply is needed, should illegal carpooling services then be regulated to meet demand, similar to how ride-hailing services were when they first disrupted the taxi industry?
Well, no. Assoc Prof Theseira noted that unregulated ride services on platforms like Telegram bypass even the most basic licensing and safety checks.
“That’s where the authorities draw the line, and in my opinion, they’re right to do so. Many of these providers refuse to comply with even the most fundamental regulatory requirements.
“This is concerning because these regulations aren’t particularly difficult to meet. Licensing isn’t overly restrictive, and vehicle inspections aren’t too demanding. If a service provider isn’t willing to meet these minimum standards, that’s a red flag,” said Assoc Prof Theseira.
Indeed, CNA TODAY found that passengers who have made use of Telehitch quite often discover the dangers for themselves – and quickly wise up.
Mr Koh, the Telehitch passenger, said he only takes Telehitch if legal ride-hailing services are “way too expensive”, while others have sworn off illegal carpooling altogether.
Ms Lim, the communications associate who stopped using such services in 2023, said she would not recommend them to anyone, especially women.
She said that she was able to tolerate the risks previously because she felt confident in her ability to navigate them.
“But now that I’m juggling both work and studies, I just don’t have the capacity to deal with people who would waste my time.”
Ms Azula, the content creator, said that after getting detained at Woodlands Checkpoint, she now strictly avoids unregulated car rides within and out of Singapore.
“I get why people choose the cheaper option because the door-to-door service is convenient, especially when you’re tired. But after this incident, I’d rather walk to Malaysia every day.”